Jonathan P. Baird

Over the last month or two, the Trump regime has been blowing up boats mostly off the coast of Venezuela. As of this writing on October 26, the U.S. military has killed 43 people in ten separate attacks. It is a kill first, ask questions later approach. The president of Colombia has said we killed a fisherman. The Trump regime has provided no evidence to support its claim that the vessels were carrying drugs.

Extrajudicial murder is now U.S. policy. No need for evidence, trial or any judicial process. If Trump wants you dead, that’s enough. These murders are crimes and people who have been murdered are not recognized as human beings with any rights. They have been dehumanized by an erratic individual who last week was self-promoting for the Nobel Peace Prize.

The Venezuela episode demonstrates unprecedented recklessness and it is unclear if Trump intends a much wider scale attack on that country. The U.S. Navy has amassed an armada offshore. Congress has not been debating our foreign policy even though it is that branch of government that has the sole constitutional authority to declare war. Congress has been reduced to a nullity.

Without knowing more about the history of Latin America, it would be easy to see this episode as bizarre and exceptional. I would argue it is entirely consistent with America’s imperialist history in Latin America. Since the 19th century, America has used its enormous military, economic and political power to exercise control over Latin America. The best overview I have seen is Eduardo Galeano’s book, Open Veins of Latin America. Galeano writes:

“Latin America is the region of open veins. Everything, from the discovery until our times, has always been transmuted into European – or later Unites States – capital, and as such has accumulated in distant centers of power. Everything: the soil, its fruits and its mineral-rich depths, the people and their capacity to work and to consume, natural resources and human resources. Production methods and class structure have been successively determined from outside for each area by meshing it into the universal gearbox of capitalism.”

I would go back to the Monroe Doctrine in the early 19th century as a defining framework that declared European powers cannot colonize or interfere in the Americas. The Monroe Doctrine laid the groundwork for U.S. hegemony in the region.

Next came the Mexican-American War from 1846-1848 in which the U.S. vastly expanded its territory, taking enormous swaths of land from Mexico.

Our imperialism took off though in the late 19th century. In 1898, the U.S. intervened in Cuba’s fight for independence and the Spanish-American War led to our control over Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines and Guam. The Platt Amendment in 1901 gave the U.S. the right to intervene in Cuban affairs and to establish naval bases. Around the same time, we also secured control over the Panama Canal.

In 1904. President Theodore Roosevelt expanded the Monroe Doctrine with his Roosevelt Corollary that claimed the U.S. had the right to intervene in Latin American affairs to maintain stability. This led to numerous U.S. interventions in Cuba, Honduras, Nicaragua, Haiti and the Dominican Republic. The era is well-described by Major General Smedley Butler in his book, War is a Racket:

“I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of the country’s most agile military force – the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from a second lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism.”

In 1954, the CIA engineered a coup in Guatemala that overthrew the democratically elected government of Jacobo Arbenz Guzman. Later in 1973, the U.S. assisted the fascist military of Gen. Augusto Pinochet in overthrowing another democratically elected leader, Salvador Allende.

There were numerous other U.S. interventions I have not mentioned like the Dominican Republic in 1965 and U.S. support against revolutionaries in Nicaragua and El Salvador. Our government supported brutal military dictatorships like existed in Argentina during the dirty war. Behind the scenes, the U.S. provided substantial support to Operation Condor, a terror campaign/international death squad conducted by Latin military dictatorships in the 1970’s and 1980’s.

Trump’s Venezuela initiatives blowing up boats and threatening military action must not be seen as an isolated foray. It fits inside the long history of interventions. There have been many American regime change efforts in Latin American history. What is going on now is an increasingly unilateral Big Stick diplomacy characterized by macho posturing. It is a reassertion of the Monroe Doctrine.

Latin America still holds vast reserves of critical minerals, oil and gas reserves and a third of the planet’s arable land. The desire for economic imperialist control remains constant.

The cast of characters in charge of our foreign policy is anything but reassuring. I think it is extremely worrisome that Admiral Alvin Holsey, the head of the U.S. Southern Command responsible for Latin America, resigned abruptly. It is a tragic state of affairs when the direction of a great power correlates to the whims of a dictator and the stooges who surround him. Military adventurism by the so-called peace president would appear to be in the cards.